TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficiency and accuracy of GPU-parallelized Fourier spectral methods for solving phase-field models
AU - Boccardo, A. D.
AU - Tong, M.
AU - Leen, S. B.
AU - Tourret, D.
AU - Segurado, J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Phase-field models are widely employed to simulate microstructure evolution during processes such as solidification or heat treatment. The resulting partial differential equations, often strongly coupled together, may be solved by a broad range of numerical methods, but this often results in a high computational cost, which calls for advanced numerical methods to accelerate their resolution. Here, we quantitatively test the efficiency and accuracy of semi-implicit Fourier spectral-based methods, implemented in Python programming language and parallelized on a graphics processing unit (GPU), for solving a phase-field model coupling Cahn–Hilliard and Allen–Cahn equations. We compare computational performance and accuracy with a standard explicit finite difference (FD) implementation with similar GPU parallelization on the same hardware. For a similar spatial discretization, the semi-implicit Fourier spectral (FS) solvers outperform the FD resolution as soon as the time step can be taken 5 to 6 times higher than afforded for the stability of the FD scheme. The accuracy of the FS methods also remains excellent even for coarse grids, while that of FD deteriorates significantly. Therefore, for an equivalent level of accuracy, semi-implicit FS methods severely outperform explicit FD, by up to 4 orders of magnitude, as they allow much coarser spatial and temporal discretization.
AB - Phase-field models are widely employed to simulate microstructure evolution during processes such as solidification or heat treatment. The resulting partial differential equations, often strongly coupled together, may be solved by a broad range of numerical methods, but this often results in a high computational cost, which calls for advanced numerical methods to accelerate their resolution. Here, we quantitatively test the efficiency and accuracy of semi-implicit Fourier spectral-based methods, implemented in Python programming language and parallelized on a graphics processing unit (GPU), for solving a phase-field model coupling Cahn–Hilliard and Allen–Cahn equations. We compare computational performance and accuracy with a standard explicit finite difference (FD) implementation with similar GPU parallelization on the same hardware. For a similar spatial discretization, the semi-implicit Fourier spectral (FS) solvers outperform the FD resolution as soon as the time step can be taken 5 to 6 times higher than afforded for the stability of the FD scheme. The accuracy of the FS methods also remains excellent even for coarse grids, while that of FD deteriorates significantly. Therefore, for an equivalent level of accuracy, semi-implicit FS methods severely outperform explicit FD, by up to 4 orders of magnitude, as they allow much coarser spatial and temporal discretization.
KW - Fourier spectral method
KW - Graphic processing unit
KW - Phase-field model
KW - Python programming language
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162231597&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112313
DO - 10.1016/j.commatsci.2023.112313
M3 - Article
SN - 0927-0256
VL - 228
JO - Computational Materials Science
JF - Computational Materials Science
M1 - 112313
ER -