Effects of sulfur dioxide exposure on leaf mass per area of selected gymnosperms and implications for interpreting the plant fossil record

Karen L. Bacon, Matthew Haworth, Jennifer C. McElwain

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Premise of research. The role of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in plant responses to large igneous province volcanism is difficult to determine but important in relation to understanding ecosystem responses during mass extinction events. Leaf mass per area (LMA) is an important leaf measure for tracking plant responses to environmental pressures in the fossil record, but how it responds to SO2 exposure is unclear, particularly for nonangiosperm taxa. Methodology. Five gymnosperm species were grown in simulated paleoatmospheric conditions that included SO2 to determine how the plants responded. Pivotal results. All plants’ growth in high SO2 showed a significant decrease in LMA compared with the control (with no SO2).When grown in a highCO2, lowO2, and highSO2 treatment,most plants continued to showa decrease inLMA compared with the control but an increase comparedwith the high SO2 treatment with ambient CO2 and O2. Conclusions. Thesefindings suggest that exposure to SO2 significantly decreasesLMA, potentially reducing preservation potential in the fossil record. Exposure to combined SO2 and high CO2 reduces this effect, but this may also obscure the effects of SO2, leading to interpretations that ecosystem instability is primarily driven by increasing CO2, which may not be the case.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)564-575
Number of pages12
JournalInternational Journal of Plant Sciences
Volume182
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Fossil record
  • Leaf mass per area
  • Mass extinctions
  • Plants
  • Sulfur dioxide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of sulfur dioxide exposure on leaf mass per area of selected gymnosperms and implications for interpreting the plant fossil record'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this