Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of glucose and blood pressure reduction on subclinical cardiac damage: Results from ADVANCE

  • Stephen P. Juraschek
  • , Dan Wang
  • , John W. McEvoy
  • , Stephen Harrap
  • , Katie Harris
  • , Giuseppe Mancia
  • , Michel Marre
  • , Bruce Neal
  • , Anushka Patel
  • , Neil R. Poulter
  • , Bryan Williams
  • , John Chalmers
  • , Mark Woodward
  • , Elizabeth Selvin
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Welch Center for Prevention Epidemiology and Clinical Research
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Milano-Bicocca
  • Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers
  • Imperial College London
  • University College London

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Observational data suggest a potential for subclinical cardiac damage from intensive blood glucose or blood pressure (BP) control, particularly in adults with very low blood glucose and BP levels. However, this has not been tested in a randomized trial. Methods: The Action in Diabetes and Vascular Disease: Preterax and Diamicron Modified Research Controlled Evaluation (ADVANCE) study was a factorial, randomized trial designed to test the effects of intensive blood glucose (hemoglobin A1c ≤6.5% versus usual care) and intensive BP (combination of perindopril-indapamide versus placebo) control on vascular events in adults with diabetes. Using mixed effects tobit models, we determined the effect of the randomized interventions on change in subclinical cardiac injury (high sensitivity cardiac troponin T [hs-cTnT]) and strain (N-terminal b-type pro natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]), 1 year after randomization. Results: Among the 682 participants, mean age was 66.1 (SD, 6.5) years; 40% were women. Mean baseline hemoglobin A1c was 7.4% (SD, 1.5) and systolic/diastolic BP was 147 (SD,21)/81 (SD,11) mmHg. After 1 year, intensive versus standard glucose control did not significantly change hs-cTnT (1.5%; 95%CI:-4.9,8.2) or NT-proBNP (−10.3%; 95%CI: −20.2%,0.9%). Intensive versus standard BP control also did not affect hs-cTnT (−2.9%; 95%CI: −8.9,3.6), but did significantly lower NT-proBNP by 21.6% (95%CI:-30.2%,-11.9%). Changes in systolic BP at 1 year (versus baseline) were strongly associated with NT-proBNP (P = 0.004), but not hs-cTnT (P = 0.95). Conclusions: In adults with diabetes, intensive BP control reduced NT-proBNP without increasing hs-cTnT, supporting the benefits and safety of intensive BP control in adults with diabetes. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov, number: NCT00145925.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-109
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume358
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Blood glucose treatment
  • Blood pressure treatment
  • Diabetes
  • High sensitivity cardiac troponin T
  • N-terminal b-type pro natriuretic peptide
  • Trial

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of glucose and blood pressure reduction on subclinical cardiac damage: Results from ADVANCE'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this