Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents or bare metal stent on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events: Patient level meta-analysis

  • Marco Valgimigli
  • , Manel Sabaté
  • , Christoph Kaiser
  • , Salvatore Brugaletta
  • , Jose Maria De La Torre Hernandez
  • , Soeren Galatius
  • , Angel Cequier
  • , Franz Eberli
  • , Adam De Belder
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • , Giuseppe Ferrante
  • Erasmus MC
  • Hospital Clínic
  • University Hospital Basel
  • University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla
  • Gentofte University Hospital
  • Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL
  • Stadtspital Triemli
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals
  • Humanitas Research Hospital

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

82 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the safety and effectiveness of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents.

Design: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cox proportional regression models stratified by trial, containing random effects, were used to assess the impact of stent type on outcomes. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval for outcomes were reported.

Data sources and study selection: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials that compared cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents with bare metal stents were selected. The principal investigators whose trials met the inclusion criteria provided data for individual patients.

Primary outcomes: The primary outcome was cardiac mortality. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, definite or probable stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularisation, and all cause death.

Results: The search yielded five randomised controlled trials, comprising 4896 participants. Compared with patients receiving bare metal stents, participants receiving cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents had a significant reduction of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.91; P=0.01), myocardial infarction (0.71, 0.55 to 0.92; P=0.01), definite stent thrombosis (0.41, 0.22 to 0.76; P=0.005), definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.48, 0.31 to 0.73; P<0.001), and target vessel revascularisation (0.29, 0.20 to 0.41; P<0.001) at a median follow-up of 720 days. There was no significant difference in all cause death between groups (0.83, 0.65 to 1.06; P=0.14). Findings remained unchanged at multivariable regression after adjustment for the acuity of clinical syndrome (for instance, acute coronary syndrome v stable coronary artery disease), diabetes mellitus, female sex, use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and up to one year ν longer duration treatment with dual antiplatelets.

Conclusions This meta-analysis offers evidence that compared with bare metal stents the use of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents improves global cardiovascular outcomes including cardiac survival, myocardial infarction, and overall stent thrombosis.

Original languageEnglish
Article number3362
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Nov 2014
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents or bare metal stent on fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events: Patient level meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this