Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of institutional volume on laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Muireann Murray

Research output: Other contribution (Published)Other contribution

Abstract

AIM: To determine whether institutional laparoscopy cholecystectomy (LC) volume affects rates of mortality, conversion to open surgery, bile leakage and bile duct injury (BDI).METHODS: Eligible studies were prospective or retrospective cohort studies that provided data on outcomes from consecutive LC procedures in single institutions. Relevant outcomes were mortality, conversion to open surgery, bile leakage and BDI. We performed a Medline search and extracted data. A regression analysis using generalized estimating equations were used to determine the influence of annual institutional LC caseload on outcomes. A sensitivity analysis was performed including only those studies that were published after 1995.RESULTS: Seventy-three cohorts (127404 LC procedures) were included. Average complication rates were 0.06% for mortality, 3.23% for conversion, 0.44% for bile leakage and 0.28% for bile duct injury. Annual institutional caseload did not influence rates of mortality (P = 0.142), bile leakage (P = 0.111) or bile duct injury (P = 0.198) although increasing caseload was associated with reduced incidence of conversion (P = 0.019). Results from the sensitivity analyses were similar.CONCLUSION: Institutional volume is a determinant of LC complications. It is unclear whether volume is directly linked to complication rates or whether it is an index for protocolised care.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Media of outputReviews
PublisherBAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
Volume3
ISBN (Print)2308-3840
ISBN (Electronic)2308-3840
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of institutional volume on laparoscopic cholecystectomy outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this