Duties of care, causation, and the implications of Chester v Afshar

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article considers the decision of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar [2005] 1 AC 134 on the question of the liability of a doctor in relation to failure to disclose a risk inherent in medical procedure. The article argues that the decision of the House of Lords in Chester can properly be explained by reference to the scope of the duty of care rather than by reference to causation.This article considers the decision of the House of Lords in Chester v Afshar [2005] 1 AC 134 on the question of the liability of a doctor in relation to failure to disclose a risk inherent in medical procedure. The article argues that the decision of the House of Lords in Chester can properly be explained by reference to the scope of the duty of care rather than by reference to causation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-167
Number of pages12
JournalEdinburgh Law Review
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Duties of care, causation, and the implications of Chester v Afshar'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this