TY - JOUR
T1 - Doppler-guided intra-operative fluid management during major abdominal surgery
T2 - Systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Walsh, S. R.
AU - Tang, T.
AU - Bass, S.
AU - Gaunt, M. E.
PY - 2008/3
Y1 - 2008/3
N2 - Background: Peri-operative fluid therapy is a controversial area with few randomised trials to guide practice. Recently, a number of trials have suggested that intra-operative therapy guided by oesophageal Doppler acquired haemodynamic variables may improve postoperative outcome. Methods: Abstract databases and conference proceedings were searched to identify randomised controlled trials comparing Doppler-guided intra-operative fluid management to standard practice in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Pooled odds ratios (POR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for categorical and continuous outcomes respectively. Results: Four trials, comprising 393 patients, were identified. Use of an oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management algorithm resulted in fewer postoperative complications (POR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.19-0.52; p < 0.0001) and shorter hospital stays (WMD 1.68 days; 95% CI: 2.39-0.98; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the quantities of intra-operative fluids administered although there was some evidence of heterogeneity with respect to this outcome. Conclusion: Oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management may improve outcome following major intra-abdominal surgery. However, comparison with fluid restriction strategies, including a cost-effectiveness analysis are required.
AB - Background: Peri-operative fluid therapy is a controversial area with few randomised trials to guide practice. Recently, a number of trials have suggested that intra-operative therapy guided by oesophageal Doppler acquired haemodynamic variables may improve postoperative outcome. Methods: Abstract databases and conference proceedings were searched to identify randomised controlled trials comparing Doppler-guided intra-operative fluid management to standard practice in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Pooled odds ratios (POR) and weighted mean differences (WMD) were calculated for categorical and continuous outcomes respectively. Results: Four trials, comprising 393 patients, were identified. Use of an oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management algorithm resulted in fewer postoperative complications (POR 0.32; 95% CI: 0.19-0.52; p < 0.0001) and shorter hospital stays (WMD 1.68 days; 95% CI: 2.39-0.98; p < 0.0001). There were no significant differences in the quantities of intra-operative fluids administered although there was some evidence of heterogeneity with respect to this outcome. Conclusion: Oesophageal Doppler-guided fluid management may improve outcome following major intra-abdominal surgery. However, comparison with fluid restriction strategies, including a cost-effectiveness analysis are required.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/38849100268
U2 - 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01516.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01516.x
M3 - Review article
SN - 1368-5031
VL - 62
SP - 466
EP - 470
JO - International Journal of Clinical Practice
JF - International Journal of Clinical Practice
IS - 3
ER -