Does oral N-acetylcysteine reduce contrast-induced renal injury in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing peripheral angiography? a randomized-controlled study

Umar Sadat, Stewart R. Walsh, Anthony G. Norden, Jonathan H. Gillard, Jonathan R. Boyle

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The nephroprotective role of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) against contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing peripheral arterial angiography remains unclear. A total of 40 patients undergoing peripheral arterial angiography were randomized to receive intravenous (iv) hydration only (group 1) or oral NAC in addition to iv hydration (group 2; ISRCTN: 35882618). Primary outcome was reduction in the elevation of urinary retinol binding protein (RBP), albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), and serum creatinine (serC). Groups 1 and 2 had equivocal percentage reduction in RBP and ACR levels from baseline (P =.80 and.30). A significant reduction in serC was, however, observed with NAC by third postprocedure day (P =.04). One patient in the treatment arm developed CIN compared with 3 patients in the control group (P =.33). Equivocal changes in RBP and ACR levels by both treatments seem to indicate that either is equally effective in affording renal protection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-230
Number of pages6
JournalAngiology
Volume62
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • N-acetylcysteine
  • contrast-induced nephropathy
  • kidney
  • nephroprotection

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Does oral N-acetylcysteine reduce contrast-induced renal injury in patients with peripheral arterial disease undergoing peripheral angiography? a randomized-controlled study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this