Abstract
A chart review was performed to determine the resuscitation status of all in-patients in this hospital on a single day. A decision not to resuscitate had been made for 11 (3.7%) of 293 patients. Seven of these patients had a severe stroke, two had dementia and one had a malignancy. We identified a further 22 patients who would be unlikely to benefit from resuscitative efforts but who had not been excluded from resuscitation: four patients with major impairment following a stroke, five patients with severe dementia and 13 patients with incurable malignancy. A policy of routinely discussing and documenting the resuscitation status of patients might reduce the unnecessary performance of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 72-73 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | Irish Medical Journal |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1993 |
| Externally published | Yes |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Do not resuscitate orders in an Irish teaching hospital.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver