Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Do antisaccade deficits in schizophrenia provide evidence of a specific inhibitory function?

  • Trinity College Dublin
  • University College Dublin
  • Fairview

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite its inhibitory control requirements, antisaccade deficits have been consistently associated with working memory impairments in schizophrenia. We investigated whether variance in antisaccade performance could be better accounted for in terms of a specific inhibitory function. METHOD: We assessed 48 clinically stable out-patients with schizophrenia on an antisaccade task, as well as on measures of spatial and verbal working memory, sustained selective attention, and a simple motoric go no-go measure of response inhibition. RESULTS: In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, go no-go task performance accounted for a considerably greater percentage of variance in antisaccade performance (25.3%) than either working memory (8.4%) or sustained selective attention task (9.1%). DISCUSSION: We conclude that antisaccade deficits in schizophrenia appear to be better understood in terms of a specific deficit of inhibitory control than in terms of more general difficulties with context maintenance or goal neglect.BACKGROUND: Despite its inhibitory control requirements, antisaccade deficits have been consistently associated with working memory impairments in schizophrenia. We investigated whether variance in antisaccade performance could be better accounted for in terms of a specific inhibitory function. METHOD: We assessed 48 clinically stable out-patients with schizophrenia on an antisaccade task, as well as on measures of spatial and verbal working memory, sustained selective attention, and a simple motoric go no-go measure of response inhibition. RESULTS: In a stepwise multiple regression analysis, go no-go task performance accounted for a considerably greater percentage of variance in antisaccade performance (25.3%) than either working memory (8.4%) or sustained selective attention task (9.1%). DISCUSSION: We conclude that antisaccade deficits in schizophrenia appear to be better understood in terms of a specific deficit of inhibitory control than in terms of more general difficulties with context maintenance or goal neglect.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Pages (from-to)901-906
Number of pages6
JournalJOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Volume12
Issue number66
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2006

Keywords

  • Antisaccade
  • Attention
  • Cognition
  • Inhibitory control
  • Schizophrenia
  • Working memory

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Donohoe, G.,Reilly, R.,Clarke, S.,Meredith, S.,Green, B.,Morris, D.,Gill, M.,Corvin, A.,Garavan, H.,Robertson, I. H.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Do antisaccade deficits in schizophrenia provide evidence of a specific inhibitory function?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this