Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Direct costs of radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a microcosting study

  • Paul Hanly
  • , Alan Ó Céilleachair
  • , Máiréad Skally
  • , Ciaran Ó Neill
  • , Linda Sharp

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy provides significant benefits in terms of reducing risk of local recurrence and death from rectal cancer. Despite this, up-to-date cost estimates for radiotherapy are lacking, potentially inhibiting policy and decision-making. Our objective was to generate an up-to-date estimate of the cost of traditional radiotherapy for rectal cancer and model the impact of a range of potential efficiency improvements. Methods: Microcosting methods were used to estimate total direct radiotherapy costs for long- (assumed at 45-50 Gy in 25 daily fractions over a 5 week period) and short-courses (assumed at 25 Gy in 5 daily fractions over a one week period). Following interviews and on-site visits to radiotherapy departments in two designated cancer centers, a radiotherapy care pathway for a typical rectal cancer patient was developed. Total direct costs were derived by applying fixed and variable unit costs to resource use within each care phase. Costs included labor, capital, consumables and overheads. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Radiotherapy treatment was estimated to cost between (sic)2,080 (5-fraction course) and (sic)3,609 (25-fraction course) for an average patient in 2012. Costs were highest in the treatment planning phase for the short-course ((sic)1,217; 58% of total costs), but highest in the radiation treatment phase for the long-course ((sic)1,974: 60% of total costs). By simultaneously varying treatment time, capacity utilization rates and linear accelerator staff numbers, the base cost fell by 20% for 5-fractions: ((sic)1,660) and 35% for 25-fractions: ((sic)2,354). Conclusions: Traditional radiotherapy for rectal cancer is relatively inexpensive. Moreover, significant savings may be achievable through service organization and provision changes. These results suggest that a strong economic argument can be made for expanding the use of radiotherapy in rectal cancer treatment.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
JournalBMC Health Services Research
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 May 2015
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct costs of radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a microcosting study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this