TY - JOUR
T1 - Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events
T2 - Six month results of a randomized trial
AU - Ijsselmuiden, A. J.J.
AU - Serruys, P. W.
AU - Scholte, A.
AU - Kiemeneij, F.
AU - Slagboom, T.
AU - Wieken, L. R.Vd
AU - Tangelder, G. J.
AU - Laarman, G. J.
PY - 2003/3
Y1 - 2003/3
N2 - Study objectives To compare the tong-term angiographic, clinical and economic outcome of direct stenting vs stenting after balloon predilatation. Patient population and methods Four hundred patients with coronary stenoses in a single native vessel were randomized to direct stenting vs stenting after predilatation. A major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) was defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target restenosis, repeat target- and non-target vesselrelated percutaneous coronary intervention, target Lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke. Results Stents were successfully implanted in 98.3% of patients randomized to direct stenting vs 97.8% randomized to stenting preceded by preditatation. The primary success rate of direct stenting was 88.3%, vs 97.8% for stenting preceded by balloon dilatation (P=0.01). The angiographic follow-up at 6 months included 333 of the 400 patients (83%). The binary in-stent restenosis rate was 23.1% of 163 patients randomized to direct stenting vs 18.8% of 166 patients randomized to balloon predilatation (P=0.32). By 185±25 days, MACCE had occurred in 31 of 200 (15.5%) patients randomized to direct stenting, vs 33 of 200 (16.5%) randomized to predilatation (P=0.89). At 6 months, costs associated with the direct stenting strategy (Euros 3222/patient) were similar to those associated with predilatation (Euros 3428/patient, P=0.43). However, procedural costs were significantly lower. It is noteworthy that, on multivariate analysis, a baseline C-reactive protein level > 10 mg l-1 was a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio: 2.10, P=0.025) as well as of MACCE (odds ratio: 1.94, P=0.045). Conclusions Compared to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting was associated with similar 6-month restenosis and MACCE rates. Procedural, but not overall 6-month costs, were reduced by direct stenting. An increased baseline CRP level was an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after coronary stent implantation.
AB - Study objectives To compare the tong-term angiographic, clinical and economic outcome of direct stenting vs stenting after balloon predilatation. Patient population and methods Four hundred patients with coronary stenoses in a single native vessel were randomized to direct stenting vs stenting after predilatation. A major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) was defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target restenosis, repeat target- and non-target vesselrelated percutaneous coronary intervention, target Lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke. Results Stents were successfully implanted in 98.3% of patients randomized to direct stenting vs 97.8% randomized to stenting preceded by preditatation. The primary success rate of direct stenting was 88.3%, vs 97.8% for stenting preceded by balloon dilatation (P=0.01). The angiographic follow-up at 6 months included 333 of the 400 patients (83%). The binary in-stent restenosis rate was 23.1% of 163 patients randomized to direct stenting vs 18.8% of 166 patients randomized to balloon predilatation (P=0.32). By 185±25 days, MACCE had occurred in 31 of 200 (15.5%) patients randomized to direct stenting, vs 33 of 200 (16.5%) randomized to predilatation (P=0.89). At 6 months, costs associated with the direct stenting strategy (Euros 3222/patient) were similar to those associated with predilatation (Euros 3428/patient, P=0.43). However, procedural costs were significantly lower. It is noteworthy that, on multivariate analysis, a baseline C-reactive protein level > 10 mg l-1 was a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio: 2.10, P=0.025) as well as of MACCE (odds ratio: 1.94, P=0.045). Conclusions Compared to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting was associated with similar 6-month restenosis and MACCE rates. Procedural, but not overall 6-month costs, were reduced by direct stenting. An increased baseline CRP level was an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after coronary stent implantation.
KW - Coronary artery disease
KW - Coronary revascularization cost
KW - Coronary stent
KW - Direct stenting
KW - Predilatation
KW - Restenosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0344838577&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00701-7
DO - 10.1016/S0195-668X(02)00701-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 12633544
AN - SCOPUS:0344838577
SN - 0195-668X
VL - 24
SP - 421
EP - 429
JO - European Heart Journal
JF - European Heart Journal
IS - 5
ER -