Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: Six month results of a randomized trial

A. J.J. Ijsselmuiden, P. W. Serruys, A. Scholte, F. Kiemeneij, T. Slagboom, L. R.Vd Wieken, G. J. Tangelder, G. J. Laarman

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study objectives To compare the tong-term angiographic, clinical and economic outcome of direct stenting vs stenting after balloon predilatation. Patient population and methods Four hundred patients with coronary stenoses in a single native vessel were randomized to direct stenting vs stenting after predilatation. A major adverse cardiac and cerebral event (MACCE) was defined as death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target restenosis, repeat target- and non-target vesselrelated percutaneous coronary intervention, target Lesion revascularization, coronary artery bypass surgery and stroke. Results Stents were successfully implanted in 98.3% of patients randomized to direct stenting vs 97.8% randomized to stenting preceded by preditatation. The primary success rate of direct stenting was 88.3%, vs 97.8% for stenting preceded by balloon dilatation (P=0.01). The angiographic follow-up at 6 months included 333 of the 400 patients (83%). The binary in-stent restenosis rate was 23.1% of 163 patients randomized to direct stenting vs 18.8% of 166 patients randomized to balloon predilatation (P=0.32). By 185±25 days, MACCE had occurred in 31 of 200 (15.5%) patients randomized to direct stenting, vs 33 of 200 (16.5%) randomized to predilatation (P=0.89). At 6 months, costs associated with the direct stenting strategy (Euros 3222/patient) were similar to those associated with predilatation (Euros 3428/patient, P=0.43). However, procedural costs were significantly lower. It is noteworthy that, on multivariate analysis, a baseline C-reactive protein level > 10 mg l-1 was a predictor of restenosis (odds ratio: 2.10, P=0.025) as well as of MACCE (odds ratio: 1.94, P=0.045). Conclusions Compared to stenting preceded by balloon predilatation, direct stenting was associated with similar 6-month restenosis and MACCE rates. Procedural, but not overall 6-month costs, were reduced by direct stenting. An increased baseline CRP level was an independent predictor of adverse long-term outcome after coronary stent implantation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)421-429
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Heart Journal
Volume24
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Coronary artery disease
  • Coronary revascularization cost
  • Coronary stent
  • Direct stenting
  • Predilatation
  • Restenosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Direct coronary stent implantation does not reduce the incidence of in-stent restenosis or major adverse cardiac events: Six month results of a randomized trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this