TY - JOUR
T1 - Detection and management of decreased fetal movements in Ireland
T2 - A national survey of midwives' and obstetricians' practices
AU - Smith, Valerie
AU - Begley, Cecily
AU - Devane, Declan
PY - 2014/1
Y1 - 2014/1
N2 - Objective: to determine midwives' and obstetricians' practices for detecting and managing decreased fetal movements (DFM) during pregnancy. Design and participants: a descriptive survey of all consultant obstetricians practising obstetrics in the Republic of Ireland and a representative sample of midwives practising midwifery in all 19 maternity units in the Republic of Ireland at the time of survey distribution. Methods: following ethical approval, a questionnaire was mailed to consultant obstetricians and to Directors of Midwifery in September 2011 with a request for completion. Two postal reminders with further copies of the questionnaire were issued to non-responders. Data were analysed with SPSS Version 18. Findings: midwifery and obstetric response rates to the survey were 82% (n=47) and 71% (n=89) respectively. The majority of respondents reported an absence of local guidelines for detecting and managing DFM in pregnancy. Less than 10 movements in 12. hours was the most frequently provided definition of DFM. A minority of respondents routinely recommended formal fetal movement counting for low-risk women (24% and 19% for midwives and obstetricians respectively). This increased considerably, however, for women who presented with DFM (62% and 47% in low risk women and 78% and 51% in high-risk women for midwives and obstetricians respectively). The Cardiff count-to-ten method was the chart of choice for more than 70% of all respondents. Large variations in management strategies for women presenting with DFM was identified; however, almost all respondents would perform a cardiotocograph (CTG) in women presenting with DFM. Conclusion: further research on DFM and, in particular, large prospective studies on optimum management strategies for women presenting with DFM during pregnancy are needed.
AB - Objective: to determine midwives' and obstetricians' practices for detecting and managing decreased fetal movements (DFM) during pregnancy. Design and participants: a descriptive survey of all consultant obstetricians practising obstetrics in the Republic of Ireland and a representative sample of midwives practising midwifery in all 19 maternity units in the Republic of Ireland at the time of survey distribution. Methods: following ethical approval, a questionnaire was mailed to consultant obstetricians and to Directors of Midwifery in September 2011 with a request for completion. Two postal reminders with further copies of the questionnaire were issued to non-responders. Data were analysed with SPSS Version 18. Findings: midwifery and obstetric response rates to the survey were 82% (n=47) and 71% (n=89) respectively. The majority of respondents reported an absence of local guidelines for detecting and managing DFM in pregnancy. Less than 10 movements in 12. hours was the most frequently provided definition of DFM. A minority of respondents routinely recommended formal fetal movement counting for low-risk women (24% and 19% for midwives and obstetricians respectively). This increased considerably, however, for women who presented with DFM (62% and 47% in low risk women and 78% and 51% in high-risk women for midwives and obstetricians respectively). The Cardiff count-to-ten method was the chart of choice for more than 70% of all respondents. Large variations in management strategies for women presenting with DFM was identified; however, almost all respondents would perform a cardiotocograph (CTG) in women presenting with DFM. Conclusion: further research on DFM and, in particular, large prospective studies on optimum management strategies for women presenting with DFM during pregnancy are needed.
KW - Decreased fetal movements
KW - Fetal movement counting
KW - Fetal movements
KW - Kick-charts
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84889643643
U2 - 10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.006
DO - 10.1016/j.midw.2013.02.006
M3 - Article
SN - 0266-6138
VL - 30
SP - 43
EP - 49
JO - Midwifery
JF - Midwifery
IS - 1
ER -