Abstract
Consensus opinion and systematic reviews supports the use of compression therapy as the ‘gold standard’ for the management of venous leg ulceration (VLU). However, although widely used, significant limitations to this treatment modality persist including; poor compliance, negative impact on quality of life, bandage bulk limiting footwear choices, high visibility to others, cost and the requirement in most cases for application by health care professionals. Additionally, based on results of over 48 RCTs healing outcomes are improved with compression, yet, overall healing rates leave significant scope for improvement. This chapter describes the various systems available in the United Kingdom and Ireland together with the indications and limitations for use.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Compression and Chronic Wound Management |
| Publisher | Springer International Publishing |
| Pages | 39-64 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783030011956 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783030011949 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- ABPI
- Compliance
- Compression
- Contraindications
- Healing
- Venous ulceration
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Delivering Compression to Treat Chronic Wounds in the UK & Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver