TY - JOUR
T1 - Damages for breach of a Keep-Open Clause
T2 - Douglas Shelf Seven Ltd v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd
AU - Hogg, Martin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2007, Edinburgh University Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2007/9
Y1 - 2007/9
N2 - In recent years the courts have been more used to considering the question of “keep-open” clauses in leases from the perspective of whether or not such clauses may be enforced by order of specific implement.1 As it is less common to find detailed judicial consideration of the quantum of damages which may be claimed for breach of keep-open clauses, the decision of the Outer House in Douglas Shelf Seven Ltd v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd and another2 is worthy of note. In a detailed judgment running to over six hundred paragraphs, Lord Reed makes some impor-tant observations on the assessment of damages in such cases, as well as on whether consent to a sub-lease constitutes delegation of the tenant’s duty to keep the premises open.
AB - In recent years the courts have been more used to considering the question of “keep-open” clauses in leases from the perspective of whether or not such clauses may be enforced by order of specific implement.1 As it is less common to find detailed judicial consideration of the quantum of damages which may be claimed for breach of keep-open clauses, the decision of the Outer House in Douglas Shelf Seven Ltd v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd and another2 is worthy of note. In a detailed judgment running to over six hundred paragraphs, Lord Reed makes some impor-tant observations on the assessment of damages in such cases, as well as on whether consent to a sub-lease constitutes delegation of the tenant’s duty to keep the premises open.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84924165232
U2 - 10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.416
DO - 10.3366/elr.2007.11.3.416
M3 - Article
SN - 1364-9809
VL - 11
SP - 416
EP - 421
JO - Edinburgh Law Review
JF - Edinburgh Law Review
IS - 3
ER -