Abstract
In recent years the courts have been more used to considering the question of “keep-open” clauses in leases from the perspective of whether or not such clauses may be enforced by order of specific implement.1 As it is less common to find detailed judicial consideration of the quantum of damages which may be claimed for breach of keep-open clauses, the decision of the Outer House in Douglas Shelf Seven Ltd v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd and another2 is worthy of note. In a detailed judgment running to over six hundred paragraphs, Lord Reed makes some impor-tant observations on the assessment of damages in such cases, as well as on whether consent to a sub-lease constitutes delegation of the tenant’s duty to keep the premises open.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 416-421 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Edinburgh Law Review |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sep 2007 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Damages for breach of a Keep-Open Clause: Douglas Shelf Seven Ltd v Co-operative Wholesale Society Ltd'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver