Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase

  • Arie Pieter Kappetein
  • , Keith D. Dawkins
  • , Friedrich W. Mohr
  • , Marie Claude Morice
  • , Michael J. Mack
  • , Mary E. Russell
  • , Jose Pomar
  • , Patrick W.J.C. Serruys
  • Erasmus MC

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

187 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents is challenging coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the gold standard for treatment of three-vessel and left main coronary disease. We evaluated the current practice pattern in hospitals throughout Europe and USA. Methods: To qualify for participation in the SYNTAX (Synergy between PCI with TAXUS drug-eluting stent and Cardiac Surgery) study, a randomized trial comparing percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel and left main disease, 104 centers were asked to provide their case volume in 3 months in 2004. Anonymous procedural data were collected. Results: A total of 12,072 patients were recorded. Coronary artery bypass grafting was the most frequently performed procedure (N = 8895, 74%). Three-vessel disease (3VD) predominated in this population (N = 8532, 71%) versus left main (N = 3540, 29%). In the 3-month period, per center a mean of 8.3 patients with left main and 22.3 patients with three-vessel disease were treated by percutaneous coronary intervention, while 26.0 patients with left main and 60.3 patients with three-vessel disease were treated by coronary artery bypass grafting. In USA, percutaneous coronary intervention for left main and/or three-vessel disease was performed in 18% of the cases while this was performed in 29% of the cases in Europe. Of all CABG procedures, only 12% were done with total arterial grafting while 7% were treated with only venous grafts. Conclusions: In patients with multivessel or left main disease, still coronary artery bypass grafting remains the dominant revascularization strategy. Percutaneous coronary intervention is performed frequently without supporting data from the literature. Percutaneous coronary intervention for this indication is performed more often in Europe than in USA. Only a minority of the patients receives total arterial grafting in case of coronary artery bypass grafting. The SYNTAX trial with randomized and registry cohorts should provide guidance for selecting the preferred form of treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)486-491
Number of pages6
JournalEuropean Journal of Cardio-thoracic Surgery
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2006
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Coronary artery bypasses grafting
  • Coronary revascularization
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this