Abstract
As mandates for social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities remain unfulfilled, many scholars question whether the concept of inclusion is to blame. Critics worry that quantitative measurements of inclusion miss what should count: a meaningful life gained from a sense of belonging. We argue that both concepts – inclusion and belonging – embody a communitarian ethos in which citizens mirror the values of their community. In contrast, Chantal Mouffe’s radical democratic approach to inclusion emphasizes the importance of difference and the inevitability of exclusion. Mouffe thus offers a way to broaden our approach to social inclusion in the twenty-first century.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 717-730 |
| Number of pages | 14 |
| Journal | Disability and Society |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 28 May 2015 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- belonging
- community
- identity
- intellectual disability
- radical democracy
- social inclusion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Counting inclusion with Chantal Mouffe: a radical democratic approach to intellectual disability research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver