Abstract
The aim of this paper is to assess the costs and effects of stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Data have been taken from both the BENESTENT-I and BENESTENT-II pilot study. Effects are expressed in terms of event-free survival and costs include those of the initial hospitalization and those during follow-up. The costs per additional event-free survivor after 7 months are estimated at Dfl 88,315, Dfl 28,127 and Dfl 6747 using respectively the results from the BENSTENT-I study, the BENESTENT-II pilot study and phase IV of the BENESTENT-II pilot study. Significant decreases in complications and ischaemic events have made stent implantation not only the most favourable in terms of event-free survival but also in terms of cost effectiveness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 263-268 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Seminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 1996 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cost effectiveness of stent implantation versus PTCA: the BENESTENT experience.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver