Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cost effectiveness of stent implantation versus PTCA: the BENESTENT experience.

  • B. A. Van Hout
  • , T. van der Woude
  • , P. P. de Jaegere
  • , M. van den Brand
  • , G. A. van Es
  • , P. W. Serruys
  • , M. A. Morel
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the costs and effects of stent implantation versus percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA). Data have been taken from both the BENESTENT-I and BENESTENT-II pilot study. Effects are expressed in terms of event-free survival and costs include those of the initial hospitalization and those during follow-up. The costs per additional event-free survivor after 7 months are estimated at Dfl 88,315, Dfl 28,127 and Dfl 6747 using respectively the results from the BENSTENT-I study, the BENESTENT-II pilot study and phase IV of the BENESTENT-II pilot study. Significant decreases in complications and ischaemic events have made stent implantation not only the most favourable in terms of event-free survival but also in terms of cost effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)263-268
Number of pages6
JournalSeminars in interventional cardiology : SIIC
Volume1
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - Dec 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cost effectiveness of stent implantation versus PTCA: the BENESTENT experience.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this