Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Coronary-stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty

  • John A. Bittl
  • , Leonard Schwartz
  • , Patrick W. Serruys
  • , David L. Fischman
  • , Michael P. Savage
  • , Sheldon Goldberg
  • , Eric J. Topol
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University Health Network
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Letterpeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To the Editor: The Benestent1 and Stent Restenosis (STRESS)2 studies (Aug. 25 issue) raise important questions about strategies for coronary-stent placement. Should coronary stents be considered for all patients with new focal lesions in large coronary arteries that have a high likelihood of dissection,3 or should they be used only on a conditional basis if balloon angioplasty does not achieve the desired degree of dilation? Although the randomized studies1,2 showed that coronary-stent placement reduced the rate of clinical restenosis, the only component of the composite end point that was favorably affected was the need for a second intervention involving…

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)536-538
Number of pages3
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume332
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 23 Feb 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary-stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this