Abstract
To the Editor: The Benestent1 and Stent Restenosis (STRESS)2 studies (Aug. 25 issue) raise important questions about strategies for coronary-stent placement. Should coronary stents be considered for all patients with new focal lesions in large coronary arteries that have a high likelihood of dissection,3 or should they be used only on a conditional basis if balloon angioplasty does not achieve the desired degree of dilation? Although the randomized studies1,2 showed that coronary-stent placement reduced the rate of clinical restenosis, the only component of the composite end point that was favorably affected was the need for a second intervention involving…
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 536-538 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 332 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 23 Feb 1995 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Coronary-stent placement compared with balloon angioplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver