TY - JOUR
T1 - Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
T2 - A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data
AU - Lee, Cheol Whan
AU - Ahn, Jung Min
AU - Cavalcante, Rafael
AU - Sotomi, Yohei
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Suwannasom, Pannipa
AU - Tenekecioglu, Erhan
AU - Yun, Sung Cheol
AU - Park, Duk Woo
AU - Kang, Soo Jin
AU - Lee, Seung Whan
AU - Kim, Young Hak
AU - Park, Seong Wook
AU - Serruys, Patrick W.
AU - Park, Seung Jung
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation
PY - 2016/12/26
Y1 - 2016/12/26
N2 - Objectives The authors undertook a patient-level meta-analysis to compare long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 3,280 patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Background The relative efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI with DES for left main or multivessel CAD remain controversial. Methods Data were pooled from the BEST (Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease), PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery vs. Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), and SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trials. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results The median follow-up was 60 months, and follow-up was completed for 96.2% of patients. The rate of primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (13.0% vs. 16.0%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69 to 1.00; p = 0.046). The difference was mainly driven by reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.64; p < 0.001). There was significant interaction between treatment effect and types of CAD, showing CABG to be superior compared with PCI with DES in patients with multivessel CAD (p = 0.001), but no between-group difference in those with left main CAD (p = 0.427). The rates for all-cause death and stroke were similar between the 2 groups. By contrast, the need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group compared with the PCI group. Conclusions CABG, as compared with PCI with DES, reduced long-term rates of the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with left main or multivessel CAD. The advantage of CABG over PCI with DES was particularly pronounced in those with multivessel CAD.
AB - Objectives The authors undertook a patient-level meta-analysis to compare long-term outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug-eluting stents (DES) in 3,280 patients with left main or multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD). Background The relative efficacy and safety of CABG versus PCI with DES for left main or multivessel CAD remain controversial. Methods Data were pooled from the BEST (Randomized Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery and Everolimus Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease), PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery vs. Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), and SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) trials. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Results The median follow-up was 60 months, and follow-up was completed for 96.2% of patients. The rate of primary outcome was significantly lower with CABG than with PCI (13.0% vs. 16.0%; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.69 to 1.00; p = 0.046). The difference was mainly driven by reduction in myocardial infarction (HR: 0.46; 95% CI: 0.33 to 0.64; p < 0.001). There was significant interaction between treatment effect and types of CAD, showing CABG to be superior compared with PCI with DES in patients with multivessel CAD (p = 0.001), but no between-group difference in those with left main CAD (p = 0.427). The rates for all-cause death and stroke were similar between the 2 groups. By contrast, the need for repeat revascularization was significantly lower in the CABG group compared with the PCI group. Conclusions CABG, as compared with PCI with DES, reduced long-term rates of the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or stroke in patients with left main or multivessel CAD. The advantage of CABG over PCI with DES was particularly pronounced in those with multivessel CAD.
KW - coronary artery bypass graft surgery
KW - drug-eluting stent(s)
KW - left main coronary artery disease
KW - multivessel coronary artery disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85006340109&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008
DO - 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 28007199
AN - SCOPUS:85006340109
SN - 1936-8798
VL - 9
SP - 2481
EP - 2489
JO - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 24
ER -