TY - JOUR
T1 - Constructivist Grounded Theory
T2 - Recognising and Raising the Voice of Young People with Experience of Care Systems
AU - Farragher, Róisín
AU - Coogan, Declan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 The Child Care in Practice Group.
PY - 2020/1/2
Y1 - 2020/1/2
N2 - This article describes a research project designed to explore the ways in which young people with experience of the care system in Ireland understand “family”, and family relationships. We chose Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) as the conceptual and analytical framework for the research as it focuses on privileging the voice of research participants and raises our awareness of our own personal biases/preconceptions. In this article, we reflect on the actions of researchers in the co-production of knowledge. As the study described in this paper is ongoing, we do not report on findings at this stage. Instead we clearly describe the rationale informing our choice of CGT for this research. We also outline what we have learned so far through our experiences with CGT as a research methodology. The steps adopted throughout this research project to enhance reflexivity and to address ethics in the researcher/participant dynamic also feature in this article. As there is more than one way to raise the voices of young people, we propose CGT as one way of designing and implementing research to explicitly promote the young person participant as an active coproducer of knowledge about family and care systems.
AB - This article describes a research project designed to explore the ways in which young people with experience of the care system in Ireland understand “family”, and family relationships. We chose Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) as the conceptual and analytical framework for the research as it focuses on privileging the voice of research participants and raises our awareness of our own personal biases/preconceptions. In this article, we reflect on the actions of researchers in the co-production of knowledge. As the study described in this paper is ongoing, we do not report on findings at this stage. Instead we clearly describe the rationale informing our choice of CGT for this research. We also outline what we have learned so far through our experiences with CGT as a research methodology. The steps adopted throughout this research project to enhance reflexivity and to address ethics in the researcher/participant dynamic also feature in this article. As there is more than one way to raise the voices of young people, we propose CGT as one way of designing and implementing research to explicitly promote the young person participant as an active coproducer of knowledge about family and care systems.
KW - Constructivist grounded theory
KW - reflexivity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85055155578
U2 - 10.1080/13575279.2018.1521377
DO - 10.1080/13575279.2018.1521377
M3 - Article
SN - 1357-5279
VL - 26
SP - 38
EP - 49
JO - Child Care in Practice
JF - Child Care in Practice
IS - 1
ER -