Concurrent Liability in the Scots Law of Contract and Delict

Martin Hogg

Concurrent Liability in the Scots Law of Contract and Delict

Martin Hogg

Law

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer) › Article › peer-review

Abstract

This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.

Original language	English (Ireland)
Journal	Juridical Review
Issue number	11
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 1998

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

Authors
Hogg, Martin

Cite this

@article{8f3a8d5a5dd148b4a7fe78b2ec3aec12,

title = "Concurrent Liability in the Scots Law of Contract and Delict",

abstract = "This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.",

author = "Martin Hogg",

year = "1998",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English (Ireland)",

journal = "Juridical Review",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Concurrent Liability in the Scots Law of Contract and Delict

AU - Hogg, Martin

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.

AB - This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.This article argues that it is entirely consistent with a proper understanding of the hierarchy of obligations in Scots law that a pursuer should, in general, be able to exercise a choice of whether to sue in contract or delict, where a concurrence of actions applies.

M3 - Article

JO - Juridical Review

JF - Juridical Review

IS - 11

ER -

Concurrent Liability in the Scots Law of Contract and Delict

Abstract

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

Fingerprint

Cite this