Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up

  • Shimpei Nakatani
  • , Yohei Sotomi
  • , Yuki Ishibashi
  • , Maik J. Grundeken
  • , Hiroki Tateishi
  • , Erhan Tenekecioglu
  • , Yaping Zeng
  • , Pannipa Suwannasom
  • , Evelyn Regar
  • , Maria D. Radu
  • , Lorenz Räber
  • , Hiram Bezerra
  • , Marco A. Costa
  • , Peter Fitzgerald
  • , Francesco Prati
  • , Ricardo A. Costa
  • , Jouke Dijkstra
  • , Takeshi Kimura
  • , Ken Kozuma
  • , Kengo Tanabe
  • Takashi Akasaka, Carlo Di Mario, Patrick W. Serruys, Yoshinobu Onuma, Giulio Guagliumi

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: Fully bioresorbable Absorb poly-L-lactic-acid (PLLA) scaffolds (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA, USA) are a novel approach for the treatment of coronary narrowing. Due to the translucency of the material (PLLA), the optical coherence tomography (OCT) measurement methods used in the ABSORB trials were unique but not applicable for permanent metallic stents. When the Absorb scaffold and metallic stents are compared in the context of randomised trials, it is challenging to compare the two devices using the conventional methods. The primary purpose of this report is to explain the biases in conventional methodologies applied for metallic stents and for PLLA scaffolds at baseline and follow-up, and to propose a new standard methodology that enables us to compare two different devices using an almost identical and methodological language. Methods and results: A consensus amongst multiple core labs and expert researchers of OCT was reached on a new standard OCT measurement methodology that enables us to compare these two different devices. In brief, the proposed OCT methods are summarised as follows. 1) Both endoluminal and abluminal scaffold/stent contours should be traced. 2) Consistently, endoluminal and abluminal incomplete stent apposition areas should be measured. 3) The area occupied by scaffold/stent struts should be quantified directly or virtually. 4) The strut area should be systematically excluded from the flow area as well as the neointimal area. 5) Additional information on the degree of embedment could be reported using the interpolated lumen contour. Interobserver variability of the proposed method was excellent (intraclass correlation 0.89-100). Conclusions: A standardised OCT measurement methodology is proposed. This should be implemented in ongoing and future trials comparing the Absorb scaffolds and metallic stents.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1498-1509
Number of pages12
JournalEuroIntervention
Volume12
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2016
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Analysis method
  • Comparative
  • Metallic stent
  • Optical coherence
  • PLLA scaffold
  • Tomography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative analysis method of permanent metallic stents (XIENCE) and bioresorbable poly-L-lactic (PLLA) scaffolds (Absorb) on optical coherence tomography at baseline and follow-up'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this