Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clozapine-induced hypersalivation: an estimate of prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life

  • University of Galway

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of clozapine-induced hypersalivation, and assess the impact hypersalivation has on global functioning. Methods: Participants attending a dedicated clozapine clinic were invited to undertake a structured interview regarding their experiences of clozapine-induced hypersalivation. Two psychometric instruments to measure hypersalivation, the Nocturnal Hypersalivation Rating Scale and the Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale were used. Results: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation was experienced by 92% of participants, with nocturnal hypersalivation more prevalent compared to daytime hypersalivation (85% versus 48%). Daytime drooling was severe in 18% of cases and was present on a frequent or constant basis for 20% of individuals. Hypersalivation had at least a moderate impact on the quality of life of 15% of study participants. Conclusions: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation is the most prevalent adverse effect experienced by patients treated with clozapine and negatively impacts on quality of life, particularly if daytime drooling is present. The development of further strategies to ameliorate this adverse effect is required given the demonstrated lack of success to date in managing this condition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)178-184
Number of pages7
JournalTherapeutic Advances in Psychopharmacology
Volume6
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2016

Keywords

  • clozapine
  • drooling
  • frequency
  • hypersalivation
  • incidence
  • life schizophrenia
  • prevalence
  • quality
  • severity
  • sialorrhea
  • sialorrhoea

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clozapine-induced hypersalivation: an estimate of prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this