Clinicopathological significance of borderline nuclear change - High grade dyskaryosis not excluded

C. Brodie, R. Kapur, M. Murray, L. Turner, D. Magee, D. Gibbons

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

During a recent discussion on classification of cervical cytology, the introduction of a 'Borderline Nuclear Change - High Grade Dyskaryosis Not Excluded' (BNCH) category was proposed. BNCH cases diagnosed prospectively were retrieved from laboratory records. Questionnaires were sent to referring practitioners regarding clinicopathological outcome. Cytopathological features resulting in the BNCH classification were recorded on slide review. A total of 103 reports on conventional cervical smears diagnosed as BNCH from 1999 to 2002 were retrieved, comprising 0.096% of 107 634 smears. Of 86/103 cases with clinical follow-up, CIN2 or worse was present in 30 (35%); 15 (17%) showed a borderline/low-grade abnormality and 41 (48%) were negative. No individual cytopathological feature was predictive of high-grade disease on follow-up. The yield of high-grade abnormalities on follow-up of BNCH supports the introduction of this terminology.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)18-24
Number of pages7
JournalCytopathology
Volume15
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2004
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Borderline smears
  • Cervical cytology
  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
  • Dyskaryosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicopathological significance of borderline nuclear change - High grade dyskaryosis not excluded'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this