Abstract
In a recent article, Hewat et al. 1 claimed to have developed novel procedures for treating stuttering. The present article reviews relevant literature, and shows that the Hewat et al. claims of originality are exaggerated. It is concluded that the Hewat et al. study includes conceptual and methodological weaknesses that render their findings predominantly uninterpretable.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1057-1060 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Disability and Rehabilitation |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 13 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Keywords
- Fluency training
- Rate of speaking
- Self-initiated time-out
- Stuttering
- Time-out from speaking
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Claims of a 'new' stuttering treatment using time-out from speaking are exaggerated: A brief review of the literature and commentary on Hewat et al. (2006)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver