Abstract
Managing public 'affect' was a critical component of Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 policy approach, which was predicated on collective emotional feelings of calmness, compassion and trust. A long history of health promotion efforts have involved co-opting children as tools to manipulate (adult) public affect towards motivating behavioural change or accepting health interventions. Little research has yet considered the consequences of objectifying children for affect management in the name of public health. The Pandemic Generation study compared the perspectives of Auckland children aged 7-11, generated through co-drawing comics about their pandemic experience, with a critical discourse analysis of children's representation in New Zealand COVID-19 public health messaging. In this chapter, I argue that by leveraging performative care for children to manipulate an adult public affect, the New Zealand government erased children's subjectivities, their care-giving roles and contributions, further disenfranchising children as members of the 'public' in public health.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Care and Coronavirus |
| Subtitle of host publication | Perspectives on Childhood, Youth and Family |
| Publisher | EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD |
| Pages | 81-96 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781837973101 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781837973118 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Dec 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Affect management
- Child participation
- Child-centred research
- COVID-19
- New Zealand
- Public health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Children's care for public health and politically expedient care for children in Aotearoa New Zealand's COVID-19 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver