TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenging practices
T2 - experiences from community and individual living lab approaches
AU - Matschoss, Kaisa
AU - Fahy, Frances
AU - Rau, Henrike
AU - Backhaus, Julia
AU - Goggins, Gary
AU - Grealis, Eoin
AU - Heiskanen, Eva
AU - Kajoskoski, Tuija
AU - Laakso, Senja
AU - Apajalahti, Eeva Lotta
AU - Genus, Audley
AU - Godin, Laurence
AU - Iskandarova, Marfuga
AU - Musch, Annika Kathrin
AU - Sahakian, Marlyne
AU - Scholl, Christian
AU - Vadovics, Edina
AU - Vasseur, Veronique
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - In this article, we examine a change initiative designed to involve households in testing ways to transform two everyday practices ‒ heating and doing laundry. The research design included an examination of the challenges of changing practices either in a setting that fosters collective engagement or with individual households. Two different types of living labs were carried out simultaneously in eight European countries in Autumn–Winter 2018. We reflect on differences in results in terms of both changes in practices and the experiences of participating households that we argue can be at least partially attributed to householders’ engagement in different types of living labs. We discuss the implications of an individual-focused vs. community-oriented approach for change initiatives seeking to challenge social norms for sustainability transitions, concentrating in particular on differences in the nature of participants’ engagement and their willingness and ability to challenge routine practices. This is complemented by analytical reflections on the differences in design, interaction, and performance between the two types of living labs. We show that an explicit focus on collaborative engagement in living labs can produce results that reflect shared experiences, community support, challenging established norms, and collective commitment toward change.
AB - In this article, we examine a change initiative designed to involve households in testing ways to transform two everyday practices ‒ heating and doing laundry. The research design included an examination of the challenges of changing practices either in a setting that fosters collective engagement or with individual households. Two different types of living labs were carried out simultaneously in eight European countries in Autumn–Winter 2018. We reflect on differences in results in terms of both changes in practices and the experiences of participating households that we argue can be at least partially attributed to householders’ engagement in different types of living labs. We discuss the implications of an individual-focused vs. community-oriented approach for change initiatives seeking to challenge social norms for sustainability transitions, concentrating in particular on differences in the nature of participants’ engagement and their willingness and ability to challenge routine practices. This is complemented by analytical reflections on the differences in design, interaction, and performance between the two types of living labs. We show that an explicit focus on collaborative engagement in living labs can produce results that reflect shared experiences, community support, challenging established norms, and collective commitment toward change.
KW - Community
KW - energy transition
KW - living lab
KW - social learning
KW - social norms
KW - social practices
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106244701&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15487733.2021.1902062
DO - 10.1080/15487733.2021.1902062
M3 - Article
SN - 1548-7733
VL - 17
SP - 136
EP - 152
JO - Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
JF - Sustainability: Science, Practice, and Policy
IS - 1
ER -