Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cell morphology and focal adhesion location alters internal cell stress

  • University of Galway
  • Université de Nantes

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Extracellular mechanical cues have been shown to have a profound effect on osteogenic cell behaviour. However, it is not known precisely how these cues alter intracellular mechanics to initiate changes in cell behaviour. In this study, a combination of in vitro culture of MC3T3-E1 cells and finite-element modelling was used to investigate the effects of passive differences in substrate stiffness on intracellular mechanics. Cells on collagen-based substrates were classified based on the presence of cell processes and the dimensions of various cellular features were quantified. Focal adhesion ( FA) density was quantified from immunohistochemical staining, while cell and substrate stiffnesses were measured using a live-cell atomic force microscope. Computational models of cell morphologies were developed using an applied contraction of the cell body to simulate active cell contraction. The results showed that FA density is directly related to cell morphology, while the effect of substrate stiffness on internal cell tension was modulated by both cell morphology and FA density, as investigated by varying the number of adhesion sites present in each morphological model. We propose that the cells desire to achieve a homeostatic stress state may play a role in osteogenic cell differentiation in response to extracellular mechanical cues.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
Article number20140885
JournalJournal of the Royal Society Interface
Volume11
Issue number101
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2014

Keywords

  • Extracellular mechanical environment
  • Finite-element
  • Focal adhesion
  • Osteoblast
  • Osteocyte
  • Single cell force microscopy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cell morphology and focal adhesion location alters internal cell stress'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this