Case C-66/18

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

On October 6, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Commission v. Hungary. It found that Hungary had violated the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), as well as internal European Union law-specifically the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (EU Charter). The case arose out of Hungary's 2017 amendment to its higher education law. The amendment imposed two novel requirements on foreign universities operating in Hungary. It barred any non-EU university from operating unless its country of origin concluded a specific enabling treaty with Hungary. Moreover, it required that the foreign university actually provide educational services in its country of origin. While framed in general terms, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that the 2017 amendment was aimed at ending the operations of the Central European University (CEU) in Hungary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)700-706
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of International Law
Volume115
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • direct effect
  • EU Charter of Fundamental Rights
  • Infringement procedure
  • national treatment
  • WTO law/GATS

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Case C-66/18'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this