Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution

  • Kathy Powell
  • University of Galway

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The UK referendum on European Union membership exposed profound social and political divisions, rooted in the establishment of a neoliberal consensus that eclipsed the left and arguments against inequality, and intensified over several years of post-crisis austerity’s assault on the working poor, the disadvantaged and the immigrants. The narrow vote to leave confounded expectations on both sides of the referendum campaign, provoking a political crisis that has empowered a far right unlikely to address grievances, incited intense hostility between triumphant ‘leavers’ and dismayed ‘remainers’, and produced profound uncertainty about the future. This paper argues that while ‘Brexit’ has been characterized as a ‘people’s revolt’ against capitalist globalization, the decision to leave the EU has been aligned by a discourse of nativist nationalism and attempts to re-entrench an authoritarian Conservative hegemony; these attempts are, however, floundering which poses both opportunities and challenges for a resurgent parliamentary left and for radical grassroots politics going forward.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)225-240
Number of pages16
JournalDialectical Anthropology
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sept 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 1 - No Poverty
    SDG 1 No Poverty

Keywords

  • Austerity
  • Conservative hegemony
  • EU referendum
  • Immigration
  • Labour resurgence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Brexit positions: neoliberalism, austerity and immigration—the (im)possibilities? of political revolution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this