Blue-green or grey, how much is the public willing to pay?

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Flood reduction infrastructure is a vital aspect of many urban and peri-urban areas. To date, the majority of flood reduction projects use traditional “grey” materials and techniques. However, the use of blue-green infrastructures (BGI) is becoming more popular. This paper explores residents’ preferences for BGI or grey infrastructure projects to reduce flood risk. A discrete choice experiment using a split sample methodology was employed to determine if residents of the Carlingford Lough catchment in Ireland prefer either type of infrastructure to reduce flood risk. A random parameter logit was applied to the data. The results reveal that for the average person, they have a preference for flood risk reduction resulting in a flooding event once every 25 years rather than once every five years. The average respondent also holds a preference for BGI based solutions as opposed to a grey infrastructure solution. However, respondent living in a flood-prone area show no greater preference for a BGI solution.

Original languageEnglish
Article number103909
JournalLandscape and Urban Planning
Volume203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2020

Keywords

  • Blue-green Infrastructure
  • Discrete choice experiment
  • Flooding
  • Non-market valuation
  • Split sample

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Blue-green or grey, how much is the public willing to pay?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this