Bioabsorbable coronary stents

John A. Ormiston, Patrick W.S. Serruys

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

283 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

An ideal stent should furnish best acute outcomes after PCI by sealing intimal flaps and optimizing lumen size. It should control restenosis by limiting negative remodeling and by controlling excessive healing by delivery of an antiproliferative drug. Beyond 6 months, a permanent implant has no useful function and has possible disadvantages including the potential for late thrombosis. The concept of a stent that does its job and disappears has appeal.44 A number of different materials ranging from magnesium to a variety of polymers have been used to construct stents of different designs. Some of these are being tested in clinical trials. The best outcomes to date have been with the BVS everolimus-eluting PLLA stent where in the Absorb trial, cohort A at 2 years, the stent was safe in the small number of patients with simple lesions.9,11 Indeed, there is a suggestion of luminal enlargement between 6 months and 2 years, return of vasomotion, and endothelial function. These findings need to be confirmed in larger trials in more complex lesions. A hope is that a healed, normally functioning vessel free of foreign body and restenosis will be free of the risk of late thrombosis. Time will tell if this dream will come true.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-260
Number of pages6
JournalCirculation: Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume2
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2009
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Follow-up studies
  • Remodeling
  • Restenosis
  • Stents
  • Thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bioabsorbable coronary stents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this