TY - JOUR
T1 - Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards
T2 - A systematic review of the qualitative evidence
AU - Cucurachi, Sara
AU - Lydon, Sinéad
AU - Moens, Laura Louise
AU - Manser, Tanja
AU - O'Connor, Paul
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of International Society for Quality in Health Care.
PY - 2025/7/1
Y1 - 2025/7/1
N2 - Background Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder, using behavioural change models. Methods The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis, as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behaviour) model and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorize and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework. Results Searches initially identified 7489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were a lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities, while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources - such as staffing, equipment, and funding - along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards. Conclusions Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realize this potential, we must understand the barriers to, and facilitators of, the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt of care on virtual wards.
AB - Background Virtual wards offer an alternative to traditional inpatient care, delivering acute care, monitoring, and treatment at home to prevent hospital admissions or facilitate early discharge. The aim of our qualitative systematic review was to understand the barriers to and facilitators for the successful implementation and sustainability of virtual wards from the perspective of any involved stakeholder, using behavioural change models. Methods The review protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024519627). The following databases were searched: Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Academic Search Complete. A three-stage deductive content analysis, as recommended for applying the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation-Behaviour) model and TDF (Theoretical Domains Framework) to qualitative data, was conducted to categorize and map the barriers and facilitators to virtual wards identified in the included studies, using the TDF domains as a guiding framework. Results Searches initially identified 7489 articles. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Common barriers for patients and family members were a lack of language skills, technical skills, and medical knowledge. Caregivers were also required to take on significant medical responsibilities, while patients had to remain self-motivated. The introduction of appropriate training was seen as a valuable facilitator. Healthcare providers faced numerous technological barriers that had the potential to affect care delivery. Strong leadership was an essential facilitator for effective care coordination in virtual wards. From a healthcare system perspective, the availability of resources - such as staffing, equipment, and funding - along with standardized protocols, is crucial for the successful implementation of virtual wards. Conclusions Virtual wards can ease hospital capacity issues and support the delivery of safe and effective care in patients' own homes. However, to realize this potential, we must understand the barriers to, and facilitators of, the use and successful implementation of virtual wards for patients, carers, and healthcare professionals. This understanding will allow targeted strategies and interventions to be developed to support both the delivery and receipt of care on virtual wards.
KW - Barriers
KW - Behavioral change models
KW - Facilitators
KW - Home-based Care
KW - Qualitative Evidence
KW - Qualitative Methods
KW - Virtual Wards
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105013098000
U2 - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065
DO - 10.1093/intqhc/mzaf065
M3 - Review article
C2 - 40680175
AN - SCOPUS:105013098000
SN - 1353-4505
VL - 37
JO - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
JF - International Journal for Quality in Health Care
IS - 3
M1 - mzaf065
ER -