Automation, Work and the Achievement Gap

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

Abstract

Rapid advances in AI-based automation have led to a number of existential and economic concerns. In particular, as automating technologies develop enhanced competency they seem to threaten the values associated with meaningful work. In this article, we focus on one such value: the value of achievement. We argue that achievement is a key part of what makes work meaningful and that advances in AI and automation give rise to a number achievement gaps in the workplace. This could limit peoples ability to participate in meaningful forms of work. Achievement gaps are interesting, in part, because they are the inverse of the (negative) responsibility gaps already widely discussed in the literature on AI ethics. Having described and explained the problem of achievement gaps, the article concludes by identifying four possible policy responses to the problem.
Original languageEnglish (Ireland)
JournalAI and Ethics
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020

Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)

  • Authors
  • Danaher, J. and Nyholm, S.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automation, Work and the Achievement Gap'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this