Abstract
Observer variability and accuracy of conventional rules for apex recognition is reported. Eighteen coworkers independently identified the apex in 79 LVgrams (30 deg RAO) at end diastole and end systole and assigned a confidence score from 0% to 100% for each apex. The LVgrams were selected to include those from 31 normal individuals and from 48 patients with mixed akinesis/dyskinesis as coded by conventional techniques. There was no significant difference in the confidence for the ED vs ES apices. The apex determined with respect to the superior aspect of the aortic valve proved superior to other tested methods. The concept of ″peakedness″ index is introduced and used to estimate observer variability and observer confidence.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 211-214 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Computers in Cardiology |
| Publication status | Published - 1979 |
| Event | Unknown conference - Duration: 26 Sep 1979 → 28 Sep 1979 |