Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Automated Quality Control Solution for Radiographic Imaging of Lung Diseases

  • Christoph Kleefeld
  • , Jorge Patricio Castillo Lopez
  • , Paulo R. Costa
  • , Isabelle Fitton
  • , Ahmed Mohamed
  • , Csilla Pesznyak
  • , Ricardo Ruggeri
  • , Ioannis Tsalafoutas
  • , Ioannis Tsougos
  • , Jeannie Hsiu Ding Wong
  • , Urban Zdesar
  • , Olivera Ciraj-Bjelac
  • , Virginia Tsapaki
  • Galway University Hospital
  • National Cancer Institute
  • University of São Paulo
  • AP-HP
  • University of Gezira
  • National Institute of Oncology
  • Fundación Médica de Río Negro y Neuquén-Leben Salud
  • Hamad Medical Corporation
  • University Hospital of Larissa
  • University of Malaya
  • Institute of Occupational Safety
  • International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Radiography is an essential and low-cost diagnostic method in pulmonary medicine that is used for the early detection and monitoring of lung diseases. An adequate and consistent image quality (IQ) is crucial to ensure accurate diagnosis and effective patient management. This pilot study evaluates the feasibility and effectiveness of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)’s remote and automated quality control (QC) methodology, which has been tested in multiple imaging centers. Methods: The data, collected between April and December 2022, included 47 longitudinal data sets from 22 digital radiographic units. Participants submitted metadata on the radiography setup, exposure parameters, and imaging modes. The database comprised 968 exposures, each representing multiple image quality parameters and metadata of image acquisition parameters. Python scripts were developed to collate, analyze, and visualize image quality data. Results: The pilot survey identified several critical issues affecting the future implementation of the IAEA method, as follows: (1) difficulty in accessing raw images due to manufacturer restrictions, (2) variability in IQ parameters even among identical X-ray systems and image acquisitions, (3) inconsistencies in phantom construction affecting IQ values, (4) vendor-dependent DICOM tag reporting, and (5) large variability in SNR values compared to other IQ metrics, making SNR less reliable for image quality assessment. Conclusions: Cross-comparisons among radiography systems must be taken with cautious because of the dependence on phantom construction and acquisition mode variations. Awareness of these factors will generate reliable and standardized quality control programs, which are crucial for accurate and fair evaluations, especially in high-frequency chest imaging.

Original languageEnglish
Article number4967
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number16
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • automated
  • chest radiography
  • image quality
  • quality assurance
  • quality control
  • remote

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Automated Quality Control Solution for Radiographic Imaging of Lung Diseases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this