Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association between post-percutaneous coronary intervention bivalirudin infusion and net adverse clinical events: A post hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS study

  • Chun Chin Chang
  • , Ply Chichareon
  • , Rodrigo Modolo
  • , Kuniaki Takahashi
  • , Norihiro Kogame
  • , Mariusz Tomaniak
  • , Chao Gao
  • , Kees Jan Royaards
  • , Angel Cequier
  • , Keith Oldroyd
  • , Philippe Gabriel Steg
  • , Christian Hamm
  • , Peter Jüni
  • , Marco Valgimigli
  • , Stephan Windecker
  • , Yoshinobu Onuma
  • , Rod H. Stables
  • , Robert Jan Van Geuns
  • , Patrick W. Serruys

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aims: The efficacy and safety of continued bivalirudin infusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. We sought to investigate the association between post-PCI bivalirudin infusion and the risk of net adverse clinical events (NACE) at 30 days. Methods and results: In the GLOBAL LEADERS study, all patients who received bivalirudin during PCI were categorized according to the use of bivalirudin infusion after the procedure. The primary endpoint of the present analysis was NACE [a composite of all-cause death, any stroke, any myocardial infarction, all revascularization, and bleeding assessed according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria Type 3 or 5] at 30 days. The key safety endpoint was BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding and definite stent thrombosis. Of 15 968 patients, 13 870 underwent PCI with the use of bivalirudin. In total, 7148 patients received continued bivalirudin infusion after procedure, while 6722 patients received standard care. After propensity score covariate adjustment, the risk of NACE did not significantly differ between two treatments after PCI [continued bivalirudin infusion vs. no bivalirudin infusion: 3.2% vs. 3.1%, adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.84, P = 0.06] nor the BARC Type 3 or 5 bleeding (0.7% vs. 0.7%, aHR 0.89, 95% CI 0.44-1.79; P = 0.743) and definite stent thrombosis (0.5% vs. 0.3%, aHR 1.71, 95% CI 0.77-3.81, P = 0.189). However, continued bivalirudin infusion was associated with an increased risk of NACE and definite stent thrombosis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Conclusion: In an all-comers population undergoing PCI, there was no significant difference in the risk of NACE at 30 days between continued bivalirudin infusion vs. no bivalirudin infusion after procedure but continued bivalirudin infusion was associated with a higher risk of NACE in STEMI patients when compared with no infusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)22-30
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
Volume6
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Bivalirudin
  • Coronary artery disease
  • Stent thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association between post-percutaneous coronary intervention bivalirudin infusion and net adverse clinical events: A post hoc analysis of the GLOBAL LEADERS study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this