Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antithrombotic Therapy After Venous Interventions: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

  • Sirish Kishore
  • , Minhaj S. Khaja
  • , Bartley Thornburg
  • , Aditya M. Sharma
  • , M. Grace Knuttinen
  • , Fadi Shamoun
  • , Simon Mantha
  • , Kush R. Desai
  • , Akhilesh K. Sista
  • , Stephen A. Black
  • , Gerard J. O’Sullivan
  • , John A. Kaufman
  • , Lawrence V. Hofmann
  • , Ronald S. Winokur
  • Stanford University School of Medicine
  • Palo Alto Veterans Administration Medical Center
  • University of Virginia
  • Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale-Phoenix, Arizona
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
  • New York University
  • Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  • Galway University Hospital
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interventions for thrombotic and nonthrombotic venous disorders have increased with technical advances and more trained venous specialists. Antithrombotic therapy is essential to clinical and procedural success; however, postprocedural therapeutic regimens exhibit significant heterogeneity due to limited prospective randomized data and incomplete mechanistic understanding of the critical factors driving long-term patency. Postinterventional antithrombotic therapy for thrombotic venous disorders should adhere to existing venous thromboembolism management guidelines, which include 3–6 months of therapeutic anticoagulation at minimum and consideration of extended therapy in patients with higher risk of thrombosis because of procedural or patient factors. The added benefit of antiplatelet agents in the acute and intermediate period is unknown, having shown improved long-term stent patency in some retrospective studies. Dual- and/or triple-agent therapy should be limited based on individual risks of thrombosis and bleeding. The treatment of nonthrombotic disorders is more heterogeneous, though patients with limited flow, extensive stent material, or underlying prothrombotic states such as malignancy or chronic inflammation may benefit from single-agent or multiagent antithrombotic therapy. However, the agent, dose, and duration of therapy remain indeterminate. Future prospective studies are warranted to improve patient risk stratification and standardize postprocedural antithrombotic therapy in patients receiving venous interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-187
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Journal of Roentgenology
Volume219
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • angioplasty
  • anticoagulation
  • antiplatelet
  • antithrombotic
  • deep vein thrombosis
  • guidelines
  • iliocaval
  • iliofemoral
  • portal vein
  • postthrombotic syndrome
  • splanchnic vein thrombosis
  • stent
  • thrombosis
  • vein
  • vena cava
  • venous

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antithrombotic Therapy After Venous Interventions: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this