Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An automated software for real-time quantification of wall shear stress distribution in quantitative coronary angiography data

  • Vincenzo Tufaro
  • , Ryo Torii
  • , Emrah Erdogan
  • , Pieter Kitslaar
  • , Bon Kwon Koo
  • , Roby Rakhit
  • , Grigoris V. Karamasis
  • , Christos Costa
  • , Patrick Serruys
  • , Daniel A. Jones
  • , Anthony Mathur
  • , Andreas Baumbach
  • , Jean Paul Aben
  • , Christos V. Bourantas
  • St Bartholomew's Hospital
  • Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry
  • Humanitas University
  • University College London
  • Van Yuzuncu Yil University
  • Leiden University Medical Center
  • Medis medical imaging systems bv
  • Seoul National University Hospital
  • Royal Free NHS Trust
  • Essex Cardiothoracic Centre
  • National Heart and Lung Institute
  • Yale University School of Medicine
  • Pie Medical Imaging

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Wall shear stress (WSS) estimated in 3D-quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) models appears to provide useful prognostic information and identifies high-risk patients and lesions. However, conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis is cumbersome limiting its application in the clinical arena. This report introduces a user-friendly software that allows real-time WSS computation and examines its reproducibility and accuracy in assessing WSS distribution against conventional CFD analysis. Methods: From a registry of 414 patients with borderline negative fractional flow reserve (0.81–0.85), 100 lesions were randomly selected. 3D-QCA and CFD analysis were performed using the conventional approach and the novel CAAS Workstation WSS software, and QCA as well as WSS estimations of the two approaches were compared. The reproducibility of the two methodologies was evaluated in a subgroup of 50 lesions. Results: A good agreement was noted between the conventional approach and the novel software for 3D-QCA metrics (ICC range: 0.73–0-93) and maximum WSS at the lesion site (ICC: 0.88). Both methodologies had a high reproducibility in assessing lesion severity (ICC range: 0.83–0.97 for the conventional approach; 0.84–0.96 for the CAAS Workstation WSS software) and WSS distribution (ICC: 0.85–0.89 and 0.83–0.87, respectively). Simulation time was significantly shorter using the CAAS Workstation WSS software compared to the conventional approach (4.13 ± 0.59 min vs 23.14 ± 2.56 min, p < 0.001). Conclusion: CAAS Workstation WSS software is fast, reproducible, and accurate in assessing WSS distribution. Therefore, this software is expected to enable the broad use of WSS metrics in the clinical arena to identify high-risk lesions and vulnerable patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)14-19
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Cardiology
Volume357
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jun 2022
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Computational fluid dynamics
  • Vulnerable plaque
  • Wall shear stress

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An automated software for real-time quantification of wall shear stress distribution in quantitative coronary angiography data'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this