Allogeneic interactions in Hydractinia: Is the transitory chimera beneficial?

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The colonial marine hydroid, Hydractinia, exhibits four possible outcomes to allogeneic contacts: passive rejection, aggressive rejection, stable fusion and transitory fusion. In the special case of transitory fusion, Hydractinia colonies undergo tissue fusion, followed by tissue death at the original contact area, and colony separation. This type of rejection is different in several aspects from the rejection process that accompanies incompatible encounters. It has been suggested that in transitory fusion, the colonies gain immediate benefits from fusion, mainly due to size increase, without succumbing to costs associated with fusion (germ line parasitism). We report a long-term observation of repeated fusion and separation cycles in clones featuring transitory fusion that revealed a slow-down of specific growth rates following fusion, and recovery in growth rates following separation. Very rapid transfer of stained material between partners in transitory chimeras provides suggestive evidence that protection against germ line parasitism is far from being guaranteed by separation. Our data cast doubt as to whether the benefits considered for transitory fusion are sustainable and support the already made suggestion that fusion with self, rather than fusion with kin, has been the major selective force governing the evolution of allorecognition in colonial invertebrates.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)433-438
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Developmental Biology
Volume47
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2003
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Fusion
  • Germ line parasitism
  • Invertebrate allorecognition
  • Rejection
  • Transitory fusion

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Allogeneic interactions in Hydractinia: Is the transitory chimera beneficial?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this