Abstract
Awareness and use of agile methods has grown rapidly among the
information systems development (ISD) community in recent years. Like
most previous methods, the development and promotion of these methods
have been almost entirely driven by practitioners and consultants, with
little participation from the research community during the early stages
of evolution. While these methods are now the focus of more and more
research efforts, most studies are still based on XP, Scrum, and other
industry-driven foundations, with little or no conceptual studies of ISD
agility in existence. As a result, this study proposes that there are a
number of significant conceptual shortcomings with agile methods and
the associated literature in its current state, including a lack of
clarity, theoretical glue, parsimony, limited applicability, and naivety
regarding the evolution of the concept of agility in fields outside
systems development. Furthermore, this has significant implications for
practitioners, rendering agile method comparison and many other
activities very difficult, especially in instances such as distributed
development and large teams that are not conducive to many of the
commercial agile methods. This study develops a definition and formative
taxonomy of agility in an ISD context, based on a structured literature
review of agility across a number of disciplines, including
manufacturing and management where the concept originated, matured, and
has been applied and tested thoroughly over time. The application of the
texonomy in practice is then demonstrated through a series of thought
trials conducted in a large multinational organization. The intention is
that the definition and taxonomy can then be used as a starting point
to study ISD method agility regardless of whether the method is XP or
Scrum, agile or traditional, complete or fragmented, out-of-the-box or
in-house, used as is or tailored to suit the project context.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Information Systems Research |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2009 |
Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)
- Authors
- CONBOY, K.