Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Aeolian Saltation Flux Profiles: Comparison of Representation and Measurement Methods

  • Douglas J. Sherman
  • , Jinsu Bae
  • , Jean T. Ellis
  • , Christy Swann
  • , Eric J.R. Parteli
  • , Eugene Farrell
  • , Bailiang Li
  • , Ascânio Dias Araújo
  • , Alexandre Medeiros de Carvalho
  • , Diane L. Sherman
  • , Pei Zhang
    • Department of Geography and the Environment
    • University of South Carolina
    • RCOAST
    • University Duisburg-Essen
    • Department of Geography
    • Xi'an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
    • Federal University of Ceara
    • New Mexico State University

    Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Wind-blown sand concentrations decay rapidly and in an orderly manner with height above the surface. The saltation flux profiles are of interest to understand wind and sand interactions and for fundamental measurement and modeling of associated transport rates. This study compares methods to measure and represent aeolian sand flux profiles. We measured vertical flux profiles and used quality-controlled data to test power, logarithmic, and exponential functions to reproduce the profiles. These results are used in a pragmatic assessment of the efficiency of reproducing flux profiles from vertically discontinuous arrays of traps or sensors compared to profiles obtained from continuous vertical arrays of segmented traps. Our analysis corroborates previous findings demonstrating that exponential decay functions are statistically the best method to approximate flux profiles. The results are used in a novel application to compare flux profiles reproduced from vertically discontinuous arrays of devices with those obtained from continuous vertical arrays comprising nine mesh-style traps. The results indicate that discontinuous arrays of 3, 4, 5, or 6 devices deployed less than 200 mm from the surface will effectively reproduce results from the continuous array, with average errors less than 3%. Errors increase when devices are at greater heights or as the number of devices decreases. Discontinuous arrays typically do not capture creep transport which would contribute to error in our comparisons. Therefore, creep must comprise less than 3% of total aeolian sand flux, contradicting typical assumptions of 25%.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number323
    JournalGeosciences (Switzerland)
    Volume15
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2025

    Keywords

    • creep transport
    • exponential curve
    • mesh traps
    • transport rates
    • wind-blown sand

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Aeolian Saltation Flux Profiles: Comparison of Representation and Measurement Methods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this