Abstract
Objectives: The reliability of objective measurements on digital laryngeal images was investigated. Methods: The magnitude of the error of measurement of surface areas by visually tracing the outline was determined for three different areas: the area of the lesion and, during vibration, the glottal area on maximal opening of the vocal folds and the glottal area on maximal closing of the vocal folds. Results: The errors in these areas were 10% to 30%. The results suggest that the error is mainly due to the uncertainty of the real outline of areas with a vague boundary. Correction for differences in magnification between two images (posttherapy and pretherapy) is of importance in about 25% to 65% of cases, depending on the area measured. Conclusions: Only when the magnification ratio is small (less than about ±10% from 1.0) may a correction not be necessary.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 443-450 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology |
| Volume | 114 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jun 2005 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Accuracy
- Digitized image
- Laryngostroboscopy
- Measurement error
- Vocal fold
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Accuracy of measurements on digital videostroboscopic images of the vocal folds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver