Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of an Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor in Patients Using a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device

  • Elfatih A. Hasabo
  • , Burce Isik
  • , Ammar Elgadi
  • , Magdi S. Yacoub
  • , Mohamed S. Bakr
  • , Mohammed Mahmmoud Fadelallah Eljack
  • , Sherif Sultan
  • , Kadir Caliskan
  • , Osama Soliman
  • University of Galway
  • Galway University Hospital
  • University of Limerick School of Medicine
  • University of Khartoum Faculty of Medicine
  • Faculty of Medicine
  • University of Bakht Alruda
  • Erasmus MC
  • Euro Heart Foundation

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Review articlepeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Sacubitril/valsartan is an angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) drug used to treat patients with heart failure and has shown improvement in outcomes. Different studies reported the use of an ARNI in patients using left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). However, there are limited data on the use of ARNIs in this population. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ARNIs in LVAD patients. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane from inception to November 2024. We used all relevant words for “ARNI” and “LVAD” to search, and we included studies that assessed ARNIs in patients with LVAD. Efficacy and safety outcomes were extracted from the included studies. R software version 4.4.2 was used for a meta-analysis. Results: Seven studies totaling 249 patients were included. The ARNI was found to be effective in improvements from baseline in the New York Heart Association (NYHA), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) (mean = −630.07 pg/mL, 95% CI [−1113.13, −147.01]), diuretic dose (furosemide equivalents) (mean= −76.05 mg/day, 95% CI [−145.11, −6.99]), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEED) (mean = −7.3 mm, 95% CI [−11.4, −3.1]), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (mean =5, 95% CI [3.52, 6.48]). No improvement was found in the creatinine (Cr) level. However, a slight increase in the potassium level was noticed (mean= 0.17 mEq/L, 95% CI [0.02, 0.34]). The overall mortality in patients using the ARNI was 5%, 95% CI [0.00, 20], and discontinuation was found in 25%, 95% CI [0, 100]. Conclusions: The ARNI improved several cardiac structural and hemodynamic parameters in patients on LVAD support.

Original languageEnglish
Article number7789
JournalJournal of Clinical Medicine
Volume13
Issue number24
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor
  • efficacy
  • safety
  • systematic review: meta-analysis
  • ventricular assist device

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of an Angiotensin Receptor–Neprilysin Inhibitor in Patients Using a Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this