TY - GEN
T1 - A Hybrid Algorithm for Multi-Objective Test Case Selection
AU - Saber, Takfarinas
AU - Delavernhe, Florian
AU - Papadakis, Mike
AU - Oneill, Michael
AU - Ventresque, Anthony
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/9/28
Y1 - 2018/9/28
N2 - Testing is crucial to ensure the quality of software systems-but testing is an expensive process, so test managers try to minimise the set of tests to run to save computing resources and speed up the testing process and analysis. One problem is that there are different perspectives on what is a good test and it is usually not possible to compare these dimensions. This is a perfect example of a multi-objective optimisation problem, which is hard-especially given the scale of the search space here. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid algorithm to address this problem. Our method is composed of three steps: A greedy algorithm to find quickly some good solutions, a genetic algorithm to increase the search space covered and a local search algorithm to refine the solutions. We demonstrate through a large scale empirical evaluation that our method is more reliable (better whatever the time budget) and more robust (better whatever the number of dimensions considered)-in the scenario with 4 objectives and a default execution time, we are 178% better in hypervolume on average than the state-of-the-art algorithms.
AB - Testing is crucial to ensure the quality of software systems-but testing is an expensive process, so test managers try to minimise the set of tests to run to save computing resources and speed up the testing process and analysis. One problem is that there are different perspectives on what is a good test and it is usually not possible to compare these dimensions. This is a perfect example of a multi-objective optimisation problem, which is hard-especially given the scale of the search space here. In this paper, we propose a novel hybrid algorithm to address this problem. Our method is composed of three steps: A greedy algorithm to find quickly some good solutions, a genetic algorithm to increase the search space covered and a local search algorithm to refine the solutions. We demonstrate through a large scale empirical evaluation that our method is more reliable (better whatever the time budget) and more robust (better whatever the number of dimensions considered)-in the scenario with 4 objectives and a default execution time, we are 178% better in hypervolume on average than the state-of-the-art algorithms.
KW - Hybrid-metaheuristic
KW - Multi-objective Optimisation
KW - Search-based Software Engineering
KW - Test Suite Selection
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85056282381
U2 - 10.1109/CEC.2018.8477875
DO - 10.1109/CEC.2018.8477875
M3 - Conference Publication
AN - SCOPUS:85056282381
T3 - 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2018 - Proceedings
BT - 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2018 - Proceedings
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, CEC 2018
Y2 - 8 July 2018 through 13 July 2018
ER -