Abstract
Direct laryngoscopic tracheal intubation is a potentially lifesaving procedure, but a difficult skill to acquire and maintain. The consequences of poorly performed intubation attempts are potentially severe. The Pentax AWS and the Glidescope are indirect laryngoscopes that may require less skill to use. We therefore hypothesized that AWS and Glidescope would prove superior to the Macintosh laryngoscope when used by novices in the normal and simulated difficult airway.
| Original language | English (Ireland) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 802-811 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2009 |
Authors (Note for portal: view the doc link for the full list of authors)
- Authors
- Malik MA, Hassett P, Carney J, Higgins BD, Harte BH, Laffey JG
- Malik, MA,Hassett, P,Carney, J,Higgins, BD,Harte, BH,Laffey, JG
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of the Glidescope, Pentax AWS, and Macintosh laryngoscopes when used by novice personnel: a manikin study. A manikin study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver