3D or not 3D: a guide to assess cell viability in 3D cell systems

Polina Bikmulina, Nastasia Kosheleva, Yuri Efremov, Artem Antoshin, Zahra Heydari, Valentina Kapustina, Valery Royuk, Vasily Mikhaylov, Victor Fomin, Massoud Vosough, Peter Timashev, Yury Rochev, Anastasia Shpichka

Research output: Contribution to a Journal (Peer & Non Peer)Articlepeer-review

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Cell viability is the primary integrative parameter used for various purposes, particularly when fabricating tissue equivalents (e.g., using bioprinting or scaffolding techniques), optimizing conditions to cultivate cells, testing chemicals, drugs, and biomaterials, etc. Most of the conventional methods were originally designed for a monolayer (2D) culture; however, 2D approaches fail to adequately assess a tissue-engineered construct's viability and drug effects and recapitulate the host-pathogen interactions and infectivity. This study aims at revealing the influence of particular 3D cell systems’ parameters such as the components’ concentration, gel thickness, cell density, etc. on the cell viability and applicability of standard assays. Here, we present an approach to achieving adequate and reproducible results on the cell viability in 3D collagen- and fibrin-based systems using the Live/Dead, AlamarBlue, and PicoGreen assays. Our results have demonstrated that a routine precise analysis of 3D systems should be performed using a combination of at least three methods based on different cell properties, e.g. the metabolic activity, proliferative capacity, morphology, etc.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2222-2233
Number of pages12
JournalSoft Matter
Volume18
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Feb 2022

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '3D or not 3D: a guide to assess cell viability in 3D cell systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this