TY - JOUR
T1 - 3D or not 3D
T2 - a guide to assess cell viability in 3D cell systems
AU - Bikmulina, Polina
AU - Kosheleva, Nastasia
AU - Efremov, Yuri
AU - Antoshin, Artem
AU - Heydari, Zahra
AU - Kapustina, Valentina
AU - Royuk, Valery
AU - Mikhaylov, Vasily
AU - Fomin, Victor
AU - Vosough, Massoud
AU - Timashev, Peter
AU - Rochev, Yury
AU - Shpichka, Anastasia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry
PY - 2022/2/15
Y1 - 2022/2/15
N2 - Cell viability is the primary integrative parameter used for various purposes, particularly when fabricating tissue equivalents (e.g., using bioprinting or scaffolding techniques), optimizing conditions to cultivate cells, testing chemicals, drugs, and biomaterials, etc. Most of the conventional methods were originally designed for a monolayer (2D) culture; however, 2D approaches fail to adequately assess a tissue-engineered construct's viability and drug effects and recapitulate the host-pathogen interactions and infectivity. This study aims at revealing the influence of particular 3D cell systems’ parameters such as the components’ concentration, gel thickness, cell density, etc. on the cell viability and applicability of standard assays. Here, we present an approach to achieving adequate and reproducible results on the cell viability in 3D collagen- and fibrin-based systems using the Live/Dead, AlamarBlue, and PicoGreen assays. Our results have demonstrated that a routine precise analysis of 3D systems should be performed using a combination of at least three methods based on different cell properties, e.g. the metabolic activity, proliferative capacity, morphology, etc.
AB - Cell viability is the primary integrative parameter used for various purposes, particularly when fabricating tissue equivalents (e.g., using bioprinting or scaffolding techniques), optimizing conditions to cultivate cells, testing chemicals, drugs, and biomaterials, etc. Most of the conventional methods were originally designed for a monolayer (2D) culture; however, 2D approaches fail to adequately assess a tissue-engineered construct's viability and drug effects and recapitulate the host-pathogen interactions and infectivity. This study aims at revealing the influence of particular 3D cell systems’ parameters such as the components’ concentration, gel thickness, cell density, etc. on the cell viability and applicability of standard assays. Here, we present an approach to achieving adequate and reproducible results on the cell viability in 3D collagen- and fibrin-based systems using the Live/Dead, AlamarBlue, and PicoGreen assays. Our results have demonstrated that a routine precise analysis of 3D systems should be performed using a combination of at least three methods based on different cell properties, e.g. the metabolic activity, proliferative capacity, morphology, etc.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85126831004&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/d2sm00018k
DO - 10.1039/d2sm00018k
M3 - Article
C2 - 35229856
AN - SCOPUS:85126831004
SN - 1744-683X
VL - 18
SP - 2222
EP - 2233
JO - Soft Matter
JF - Soft Matter
IS - 11
ER -